Leadership Turmoil at Ascent Bridge Limited: Independent Directors Resign Amidst Governance Disputes and EGM Drama

Key Points for Investors

• Resignation of Key Independent Directors: Dr. Tan Khee Giap and Mr. Siow Chee Keong have resigned, citing serious concerns over corporate governance, management transparency, and their impending removal via an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM).
• Governance and Transparency Issues: Both former directors allege inadequate cooperation from management, lack of timely information, and persistent failures to address board-raised concerns about operations and finances.
• Legal and Boardroom Tensions: Dispute centers around the appointment of Legal Solutions LLC as the Company’s legal adviser and the handling of a shareholder’s requisition for an EGM to remove directors.
• Board’s Response: The Board, after consulting legal counsel, withheld the full reproduction of the directors’ resignation letters in public announcements over defamation concerns, instead providing only summarized statements.

Detailed Report

Ascent Bridge Limited is currently undergoing significant boardroom upheaval following the high-profile resignations of two of its independent directors, Dr. Tan Khee Giap and Mr. Siow Chee Keong. The developments, disclosed in a series of regulatory filings and responses to Singapore Exchange Regulation Company (SGX RegCo) queries, reveal deep-seated governance concerns that may have far-reaching implications for the company’s direction and valuation.

Resignation Letters Reveal Deep Corporate Governance Concerns

Both Dr. Tan and Mr. Siow, who held key roles as Chairman and members of various Board committees, cited a breakdown in board-management relations as their main reason for departure. Dr. Tan, who was Lead Independent Director and headed the Nominating Committee, took the extraordinary step of detailing in his resignation letter that his ability to perform his duties was “hindered by management’s lack of cooperation and failure to provide requested information in a timely manner.” He further noted that executive leadership, specifically the Executive Chairman and CEO, did not uphold best practices of governance, lacked transparency, and misunderstood the role and responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director. Dr. Tan also cited that his resignation was precipitated by the Board’s decision to proceed with plans, following legal advice, to convene an EGM for the purpose of removing him as a director.

Mr. Siow, Chairman of the Audit & Risk and Remuneration Committees, echoed similar grievances. He described an environment where management’s “insufficient cooperation and failure to provide requested information in a timely and adequate manner” compromised the effectiveness of the Audit & Risk Committee. Furthermore, Mr. Siow stated that legal advice and key information related to the requisitioned EGM were not made available to him, impeding his ability to fulfill his director duties. He noted that fellow directors appeared to have already assumed the outcome of the EGM would be his removal, prompting his resignation.

Legal Concerns and Board’s Handling of Disclosures

The Board, in response to SGX RegCo, acknowledged differences between the original resignation letters and the public announcement. Specifically, the original letters named the law firms involved and the requisitioning shareholders, as well as making pointed allegations regarding governance failures and transparency lapses. The Board, on advice from its legal counsel, Legal Solutions LLC, opted not to disclose these details in the official announcement, citing possible defamation risks.

Items of Potential Price Sensitivity

• Loss of Independent Oversight: The simultaneous departure of two key independent directors and the detailed allegations of governance failures may raise investor concerns over board effectiveness, regulatory compliance, and risk management at Ascent Bridge Limited.
• Boardroom Instability Ahead of EGM: The company is preparing for an EGM that was requisitioned by significant shareholders with the explicit intent of removing directors. This points to ongoing shareholder activism and possible shifts in board composition or company strategy.
• Legal Risks and Governance Questions: The fact that the Board edited the disclosure of director resignations for fear of defamation claims further highlights the tense and potentially litigious environment within the company.
• Impact on Shareholder Confidence: These events, particularly the loss of experienced independent directors and public airing of internal disputes, could weigh on investor confidence and, by extension, the company’s share performance.

What Should Shareholders Watch For?

• Outcome of the Upcoming EGM: The meeting could lead to further changes in board composition, and potentially a shift in company strategy depending on the interests of the requisitioning shareholders.
• Regulatory Scrutiny: The public airing of governance concerns may attract further attention from regulators or prompt additional disclosure requirements.
• Market Reaction: The loss of independent oversight and the governance allegations may trigger a reassessment of risk by institutional and retail investors.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer to buy or sell securities. Investors should conduct their own due diligence or consult a professional advisor before making investment decisions.

View Ascent Bridge^ Historical chart here